Motorcycle Accident Lawsuits: What You Need to Know

Motorcycle Accident Lawsuits: What You Need to Know

by Donovan Dodrill

When it comes to motorcycle accident lawsuits, personal bias should not play a role in compensating an injured motorcyclist. Many people distrust — or even dislike — motorcyclists, and members of the jury are not immune from prejudice. Juries may be less likely to award handsome verdicts to motorcyclists compared to the driver or passenger of a car. Insurance adjusters are aware of this bias. For this reason, the burden of making a concrete case, and proving the key issues described in this post, becomes even more important for an injured motorcyclist. During the pre-litigation settlement discussion, an adjuster may be willing to concede liability. That willingness evaporates when a suit is filed.

Personal Injury Damages from Motorcycle Accident Cases

Estimating the result of a motorcycle accident trial is difficult. At trial, a jury ultimately decides just how much money the defendant must pay the injured motorcyclist. Even the most experienced attorney cannot climb inside a jury’s head and accurately predict outcomes. Pre-litigation settlement controls risk. A trial is risky.

Some personal injury damages, like medical bills and lost wages, are easier to predict because “concrete” costs like these will mostly be based on the amount the plaintiff demonstrates he or she has paid or lost and/or will continue to pay or lose. For subjective, less concrete damages like “pain and suffering,” predictions are at best an educated guess based on awards in similar motorcycle accident cases in the past. Because every case and every jury is different, even the best analysis will still only predict pain and suffering damages.

How the motorcycle accident affects a particular plaintiff is also key in valuing damages. For example, if a plaintiff is left with a permanent limp, but was formerly a very active person who enjoyed participating in a variety of sports and outdoor activities, his damages based on “loss of quality of life” will likely be higher in the eyes of a jury than if he had been relatively physically inactive before the injury. If the motorcycle accident left the plaintiff permanently disabled in a way that does not affect his livelihood, that plaintiff’s damages for lost earning potential will be lower than a plaintiff whose livelihood is affected.

Following is some data on the median “average” verdict in a motorcycle accident lawsuits, and related settlement and court verdicts:

  • According to Jury Verdict Research (published by Thomson Reuters) the median motorcycle injury verdict (after a personal injury trial) from 1999 to 2006 was $73,700.
  • $1,600,000 settlement after plaintiff slid on loose gravel and suffered crushed vertebrae and nerve damage.
  • $355,000 settlement after plaintiff was killed when the defendant’s truck, pulling a small trailer, turned left in front of the motorcycle at high speed.
  • $300,000 verdict for the plaintiff after a truck turned left in front of the motorcycle. The plaintiff’s injuries were limited to aggravation of pre-existing herniated disc, soft tissue injuries, and a torn knee ligament.

Plaza Injury Law Practice Areas

  • DUI accidents
  • Bus accidents
  • Uninsured vehicle accidents
  • Dram shop liability
  • Rear end car accidents

Posted September 16, 2019 by Plaza Injury Law
  • No Upfront Costs or Fees

    At no up-front cost to you, Plaza Injury Law provides the best legal representation in personal injury and work injury on a contingency fee basis. This means that I do not take a fee until you receive compensation. You will not incur any legal fees or costs for my time and assistance unless I successfully earn you a trial verdict or settlement. Meaning, I have every incentive to maximize your recovery. I adhere to a “Clients First” philosophy, which means that I will do everything in my power to help you receive the justice and compensation you deserve for your injury and we help you get back to normal as quickly as possible.

  • Legal Disclaimer

    This website is a form of advertising designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Your choice of legal representation is an important one and should not be based solely on advertising. Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor The Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. Co-counsel may be used or referral made.